5/2/2023 0 Comments Skatebird demo wont downloadAs if videogames would never be the same in the wake of such a transformative experience.Īnd in reality what you have is an extremely videogame-ass videogame that does a phenomenal job at demonstrating current limitations in the medium, not solving them. Yes, we'd all like to fly, but we shouldn't forget that gravity is not just a "trend", it's a default force of nature.Īnd the worst part is they used stuff like this to try to paint this game as the next coming of videogames. China's leadership has been patiently awaiting this, calculating that the high tide of democratic movement worldwide crested around 00s, 10s with the color revolutions and the various "Spring" movements.ĭictatorship may not fulfill many of the modern aspirations of advanced modern societies, but it does have a dubious pedigree of a very long historical presence. There's also been a global backlash against inclusivity and participatory politics. Now, twenty years later, the democracies of those countries operate and look very different from the western concept of such. In the west, it's pretty much unquestioned that democracy and capitalism are the "normal, expected" forms of government, but it's easy to forget that these are pretty recent developments in human civilization, and they're always being incrementally tweaked and (hopefully) improved upon.Ĭhina as a culture doesn't really have much historical experience running a democracy, and in the 90s the main liberal argument was "well, India and Russia are now running democracies so what's the excuse for China?" Back in 2004, this level was something like $2 per day, it's probably changed now. I read an economic theory that goes: democracy works when a certain percentage of the populace is above a certain threshold of income level. Imagine how distorted your perception would have to be to see the democratization of those countries as a bad thing. Though there are some economic benefits even outside that group (as you say, an emerging middle class), if you don't mind the rather obvious downsides with regards to political freedoms. They swapped their economic model to state capitalism, while retaining the authoritarian nationalist political model (and the now-outdated name of the sole political party). It's notable that that particular failure started with a single state, and most subsequent failures were deliberately patterning themselves off of that state), nor does capitalism imply a liberal democracy (in fact, pure capitalism tends to corrupt such political models, in an amusingly ironic twist on what happened to the vast majority of "communist states" where the authoritarianism corrupted the economic model). Communism does not necessarily imply an authoritarian state (actually, by definition an authoritarian state is kind of antithetical, seeing as the ideology involves the absence of a state - though most "attempts" have resulted in "communist states", authoritarian states proclaiming to be communist but failing to actually exhibit such an economic model, instead being centrally planned or even command economies. But some people like to conflate a government's economic model with its political model. Yeah, they've not been communist for a long time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |